http://alexudal.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] alexudal.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] gracheeha 2009-07-17 07:52 am (UTC)

The article of this particular scope and volume of calculations and proofs takes no less than a week before submitting. That is, writing it was started well before September 7. Is it "prikol'no" enough for you?
Not so much for ordinary Americans who don't understand a fig in construction stress analysis. However, every adult American including hosewives knows what insider trading means at the dates before September 10: http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html
You guessed it correct: September 11 is actually too late a date in the time line of a coherent investigation of 9/11. For example, this very September 10th, 2001, that you mentioned was the date when Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. That's 2 TRILLION bucks stolen, if you tired counting zeroes: http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html. The whole WTC insurance (paid in double) was mere $30 billion. Now the timing was absolutely perfect: who would remember about some accounting mistake even if 2$ Trillion big, when after 9/11? On the collapse of WTC7, there were several premature announcements on CNN and BBC, full 23 minutes before the actual collapse. Vot eto prikol, tak prikol!

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting