Entry tags:
из жизни учёных
Полемика с френдом
ygam'ом в моём посте WTC 7 и другие здания напомнила мне одну очаровательную деталь о профессоре-чехе Northwestern'а Зденеке Базанте (Zdenek Bazant) и его аспиранте-китайце Йонг Жу (Yong Zhou). После теракта 9-11 они были первые, проведшие расчёты и давшие объяснения полного коллапса башен WTC в Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE Bazant & Zhou "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?". Но что на самом деле впечатлило меня, так это то, что статья была сдана в журнал 13 сентября 2001 года!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
no subject
Not so much for ordinary Americans who don't understand a fig in construction stress analysis. However, every adult American including hosewives knows what insider trading means at the dates before September 10: http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html
You guessed it correct: September 11 is actually too late a date in the time line of a coherent investigation of 9/11. For example, this very September 10th, 2001, that you mentioned was the date when Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. That's 2 TRILLION bucks stolen, if you tired counting zeroes: http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html. The whole WTC insurance (paid in double) was mere $30 billion. Now the timing was absolutely perfect: who would remember about some accounting mistake even if 2$ Trillion big, when after 9/11? On the collapse of WTC7, there were several premature announcements on CNN and BBC, full 23 minutes before the actual collapse. Vot eto prikol, tak prikol!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Поддержка американской официальной версии 9/11 стала государственной политикой России.
Somebody at the very top out there got paid hansomely.
no subject
no subject
no subject
In any case, there's plenty of direct evidence of an "Intelligent Design" of 9/11.